To whom it may concern,
This open letter/demand is to all Governments, UN-WEF-WHO, Big Pharma Censorship Cartel, Media and Social Media companies.
This demand is being organized by Interest of Justice (IoJ), a global human rights defense and government accountability international Civil Society Organization.
Dr. Mike Yeadon, former VP of Pfizer, is IoJ’s highly credentialed Chief Scientist, and he has testified in multiple IoJ covid accountability cases since 2021. Recently, on Nov, 11, 2024 he was heard in a private hearing requested by government officials who stated they felt his testimony was highly respectable, credentialed, dense and useful. So far we are unable to have him heard in a public venue due to globally ubiquitous public WHO “information management” censorship schemes.
It is long past time to bring Dr. Mike Yeadon back to the public square and protect his right to the expression of his free opinion. The right to free and open opinion is internationally agreed upon as a non-derogable right that can never be limited, even in an emergency. Dr. Yeadon rights, and the rights of Interest of Justice to effect prompt justice for the ongoing censorship are being bi-proxy systematically and widespread censored, limited and denied, which is why we are writing this open letter and demand for redress of grievances.
It is unfair and violates International Norms that we are defenseless to share critical scientific information needed to provide informed consent because Dr. Yeadon is censored almost entirely by WHO misinformation programs, directed and controlled by UN, along with Member State governments and a global network of public private partnerships seeking to control and shape the pandemic and measures narrative.
To deny any cultural right, especially scientific opinion and participation, in such a discriminatory and systematic, widespread way, is a prima facie crime against humanity.
This is a very serious issue that requires immediate attention and redress. This widespread criminal attack on our rights to opinion is especially egregious when coupled with the documented fact that IoJ, an organization in defense of human rights, has been directly censored when posting our own messages. Our work for humanity requires our expert witness Dr. Yeadon to explain facts from our court cases to the public, so the publics right to information is met, and so we can raise legal fees, a right and duty of IoJ’s, which we can’t exercise our liberty to use our full rights, because our posts with Dr. Yeadon & other information is being censored.
By censoring Dr. Yeadon, IoJ is also being censored. We believe this is unacceptable and must be addressed legally if the censorship is not immediately remedied by those responsible.
It is worth mentioning that IoJ has compiled documented proof that prior to the rollout of the covid vaccines, 2020, one of EMA’s top scientists had the very same concerns about bio-distribution into the Placenta and ovaries, potentially leading to infertility, that Dr. Yeadon was censored by government and WHO for publicly stating. This is the publics right to know and not disinformation or misinformation, but Dr. Yeadon’s concerns were treated as misinformation and censored, despite regulators SHARING the very same concerns for pregnant women. The widespread censorship of Dr. Yeadon is undoubtably causing the essential requirements for informed consent to be denied to the users of the products, incurring liability and responsibility for all involved.
This is a letter of liability and claim of injury. Dr. Yeadon, our Chief Scientist is obviously injured in his rights to an extreme level, having been discriminated against as a whistleblower and targeted directly, rather than given whistleblower protections, and therefore he must be immediately protected and amply made whole by the public and private entities responsible for the limitation of his rights. IoJ must also be made whole in lesser form.
If the censorship of Dr. Yeadon and other ‘covid & emergency measure critics’ such as IoJ were to regretfully continue unabated, there will no choice but to file a series of legal actions, including in international human rights court as well as civil and criminal Universal Jurisdiction court, which can remedy international crimes against humanity.
The law demands some meaningful remedy for the systematic and widespread violation of Dr. Yeadon and IoJ’s right of publicity, as well as for the ongoing international serious breaches of censorship and defamation amounting to crimes against humanity, widespread discrimination and denial of informed consent.
The discriminatory and baseless attacks on Dr. Yeadon’s reputation clearly require reparations.
Reparations as a matter of International Law consists of:
<strong><em>Cessation</em></strong> of the disinformation programs causing the censorship and reputation attacks on Dr. Yeadon and IoJ - We need to exercise our liberty and right to post about our lawsuits and opinions of science or corruption.
An <strong><em>apology </em></strong>is required, but one that does not embarrass those responsible
<strong><em>Restitution</em></strong> - We are owed restitution, and be it known that Dr. Yeadon has never asked, but he is owed restitution as a strict matter of international law of state and International Organization responsibility. IoJ demands restitution for their own liberty to post about Dr. Yeadon being censored, and also for Dr. Yeadon to be amply made whole for the unprecedented discriminatory attack upon his liberty to speak out. Many were censored and all must be made whole.
<strong><em>Reasonable Assurance of Non Repetition</em></strong> - IoJ co-founders Dustin Bryce and Lady Xylie are requesting to be integrated into the remaining disinformation programs <em>(after most are cut for misuse of power)</em> in order to help the countries fulfill their duties to not cross the line into violation of human rights. IoJ co-founders are each certified in Science Diplomacy SDG’s, and in total each have 6 certificates in diplomacy. We are working with and not against in support of the project ‘Info Trust Alliance’, funded by the German Federal Foreign Office and implemented by GIZ Moldova. IoJ is dedicated to shedding light on the interplay between disinformation and other digital policy areas, such as online business models, cybersecurity, and human rights, investigating digital policy approaches that could help combat mis- and disinformation while protecting human rights and fundamental freedoms.
In support of ending the misinformation programs and bringing Dr. Yeadon back to the public square is the following Memorandum of Law:
<a href="https://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/un-global-principles-for-information-integrity-en.pdf">United Nations Global Principles For Information Integrity</a> Recommendations for Multi-stakeholder Action - According to UN a truly free and open internet is a right. The law of responsibility requires immediately restoring Dr. Yeadon & IoJ’s right to give and receive information of their own opinion and in regards to promoting legal actions in process. <em>“This erosion of the integrity of information spaces can undermine people’s ability to exercise human rights and can hamper efforts to achieve peace, prosperity and a livable future on our planet. In this way, the task of strengthening information integrity presents one of the most urgent challenges of our time…</em><strong><em>. Promoting information integrity involves empowering people to exercise their right to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds and to hold opinions without interference”
<strong><em>“A free press underpins the rule of law and serves as a cornerstone of democratic societies, enabling an informed civic discourse, holding power to account and protecting human rights. The press can be considered free wherever journalists and media workers—including women and those in vulnerable and marginalized situations—are consistently at liberty to report and operate safely and openly, and all individuals have consistent access to pluralistic and reliable sources of news.”</em></strong>
<strong>Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR)</strong>
Article 19: Right to freedom of opinion and expression, including access to information.
Article 27: Right to participate in and benefit from scientific advancement.
<strong>International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)</strong>
Article 19: Right to freedom of expression and access to information.
<strong>International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR)</strong>
Article 12: Right to the highest attainable standard of health and access to health information.
<strong>UN Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC)</strong>
Mandates transparency and accountability, especially in governance.
<strong>Siracusa Principles on the Limitation and Derogation Provisions in the ICCPR</strong>
Sets strict standards for limiting rights in public health, requiring necessity and proportionality.
<strong>International Health Regulations (IHR) (2005)</strong>
Obligates countries to maintain transparency and accountability in health risk management.
<strong>Nuremberg Code (1947)</strong>
Principle 3: Requires voluntary informed consent, prohibiting coercion in medical experimentation.
<strong>Declaration of Helsinki (World Medical Association)</strong>
Establishes ethical principles for medical research, with a focus on informed consent and patient welfare.
<strong>UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights</strong>
Imposes responsibility on corporations to respect human rights, including those in health sectors.
<strong>Council of Europe Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine (Oviedo Convention)</strong>
Protects individual rights in biology and medicine, emphasizing informed consent and personal dignity.
<strong>European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights</strong>
Article 3: Right to physical and mental integrity in health care.
Article 35: Right to preventive health care and safety.
<strong>UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC)</strong>
Article 24: Right of children to health and protection from harmful practices.
<strong>UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD)</strong>
Article 25: Right of persons with disabilities to informed consent and accessible health care.
<strong>Declaration on the Right and Responsibility to Promote and Protect Universally Recognized Human Rights</strong>
Affirms the right to access and share information on human rights violations.
<strong>Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC)</strong>
Defines and establishes accountability for crimes against humanity, including in health-related abuses.
<strong>International Law Commission’s Draft Articles on State Responsibility</strong>
Holds states accountable for wrongful acts, including those that affect health policy and human rights.
<strong>UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights</strong>
Article 6: Establishes consent as essential in health interventions, with a focus on autonomy and transparency.
<strong>Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP)</strong>
Sets international standards for ethical clinical trials, ensuring participant safety and data integrity.
<strong>Geneva Conventions and Protocols</strong>
Prohibits unethical medical experimentation, especially in conflict situations.
<strong>OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions</strong>
Sets anti-corruption standards that apply to global health governance.
<strong>UN Special Rapporteur Reports on Health and Corruption</strong>
Identifies corruption as a barrier to health rights, urging transparency and public participation.
<strong>International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (CERD)</strong>
Article 5: Protects equal access to health and the right to participate in health decision-making.
<strong>American Convention on Human Rights (ACHR)</strong>
Article 13: Protects freedom of expression and access to health information.
<strong>African Charter on Human and Peoples\' Rights (Banjul Charter)</strong>
Article 16: Right to health and access to essential health information.
<strong>International Declaration on Human Genetic Data (UNESCO)</strong>
Emphasizes ethical standards for genetic data, including informed consent and data transparency.
<strong>ILO Convention No. 169 - Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention</strong>
Article 7: Recognizes indigenous peoples’ right to participate in health decisions affecting them.
<strong>Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC)</strong>
Promotes transparency and public involvement in health, serving as a governance model.
<strong>UN Declaration on the Protection of All Persons from Being Subjected to Torture</strong>
Prohibits any medical treatment without consent that causes severe suffering.
<strong>Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health</strong>
Affirms the right to access essential medicines and public health protections.
<strong>International Law Association’s Principles on the Accountability of International Organizations</strong>
Sets transparency and accountability standards for international health authorities.
<strong>Organization of American States (OAS) Social Charter</strong>
Ensures the right to health and the duty of states to protect transparency in health.
<strong>Caribbean Cooperation in Health (CCH)</strong>
Establishes public health standards, emphasizing access to health information.
<strong>Regional Agreement on Access to Information, Public Participation and Justice in Environmental Matters (Escazú Agreement)</strong>
Emphasizes public rights to information and participation in health-related decisions.
<strong>Geneva Protocol for the Prohibition of Biological Weapons</strong>
Protects against biological experimentation and misuse of biological agents.
In addition to being grounded in international law, including international human rights law, the Global Principles complement the relevant United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the UNESCO Guidelines for the Governance of Digital Platforms, the United Nations Plan of Action on the Safety of Journalists and the Issue of Impunity, the UNESCO Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence and the United Nations Strategy and Plan of Action on Hate Speech. The Global Principles offer a resource for United Nations Member States in their considerations towards A Pact for the Future and the Global Digital Compact.
%%your signature%%
